Value Averaging (VA)
Value Averaging, also known as VA, is an investment strategy that involves making periodic contributions to an investment portfolio that aims to achieve a predetermined rate of growth or increase in value over a set period. This method, attributed to Michael E. Edleson in his book “Value Averaging: The Safe and Easy Strategy for Higher Investment Returns,” serves as an alternative to the more common Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA).
Key Concepts
Investment Contributions
Unlike Dollar Cost Averaging, where an investor commits a fixed amount of money at regular intervals, Value Averaging adjusts the amount of each contribution based on the performance of the portfolio. If the portfolio’s value has grown more than expected, the contribution amount decreases; if it has underperformed, the contribution increases. This countercyclical approach aims to buy more when prices are low and less when prices are high.
Target Value
The core idea of VA is to set a target value or portfolio worth that you aim to reach at future dates. This target grows at a predetermined rate, which can be linear or exponential depending on the investor’s goals and market expectations.
Formula for Contributions
The amount to be invested at each interval can be determined by the formula: [ \text{Investment Amount} = \text{Target Value} - \text{Current Portfolio Value} - \text{Previous Contributions} ]
Rebalancing
Due to fluctuating market conditions, the VA strategy inherently requires more active portfolio management compared to DCA. Investors need to rebalance their contributions regularly to align with the target growth.
Pros and Cons
Pros
- Countercyclical Nature: VA inherently buys more when prices are low and less when prices are high, potentially leading to better performance in volatile markets.
- Disciplined Approach: Establishes a disciplined investment framework, which can help mitigate emotional investment decisions.
Cons
- Complexity: Requires more active management and could be complex for novice investors.
- Higher Costs: Potentially higher transaction fees due to frequent rebalancing.
- Capital Intensity: May require larger investment infusions in bear markets to meet target values, necessitating liquidity.
Example
Suppose an investor sets an initial portfolio goal of $10,000 to be achieved in four years, with quarterly contributions. They expect an annual growth rate of 8%, leading to a target portfolio value as shown:
- Year 1, Q1: $10,000 * (1 + 0.02) = $10,200
- Year 1, Q2: $10,000 * (1 + 0.04) = $10,400
- Year 1, Q3: $10,000 * (1 + 0.06) = $10,600
- Year 1, Q4: $10,000 * (1 + 0.08) = $10,800
If the portfolio’s value after Q1 is $10,100, then: [ \text{Contribution for Q2} = $10,400 - $10,100 = $300 ]
Comparing VA and DCA
- Market Timing: DCA avoids timing the market by staying consistent, while VA inherently adjusts for market conditions.
- Management Intensity: DCA requires minimal management once the investment plan is set, whereas VA demands ongoing adjustments and rebalancing.
- Performance: Historical data indicates that VA can outperform DCA in volatile markets, though both strategies generally perform well in steady uptrends.
Tools and Calculators
Several financial tools and calculators aid in implementing VA strategies by automating the complex calculations and adjustments required. Some notable platforms include:
- Financial Engines: Provides robust financial advisory services including VA calculations. (Visit Financial Engines)
- Portfolio Visualizer: Offers various investment strategy simulators, including VA tools. (Visit Portfolio Visualizer)
- Personal Capital: While primarily focusing on financial planning, it also aids in customized investment strategies. (Visit Personal Capital)
Real-World Applications
Individual Investors
Individuals leveraging VA need a thorough understanding of their financial goals, market conditions, and liquidity options. It is suitable for highly disciplined investors who regularly monitor and adjust their portfolios.
Financial Advisors
Advisors can use VA to add value to their services by offering a sophisticated and tailored investment strategy to clients seeking higher returns and willing to undertake a more actively managed approach.
Institutional Investors
While less common in institutional settings due to the capital requirements and complexity, some hedge funds and portfolio managers utilize VA principles to optimize fund allocation strategies and enhance performance metrics.
Conclusion
Value Averaging presents a strategic methodology for disciplined investment and potential outperformance relative to more static approaches like Dollar Cost Averaging. Its emphasis on buying low and selling high, combined with the requirement for regular portfolio adjustments, can benefit investors aiming for steady growth with an acceptance of higher management complexity. To succeed with VA, investors must stay informed, maintain liquidity, and commit to a long-term investment perspective.